Free Essays on Sitting Bull

Sitting Bull, said to be driven by the spirit, became chief of the Sioux tribe at an early age. His leadership included the time during in which America began its explorations of â€Å"The Great West†. In their expansion, they simply pushed the Native Americans back with promises of land and equal opportunities that were available to the whites. Throughout his reign, Chief Sitting Bull led his tribe through a number of confrontations with the American Army. The most famous of which being the Battle of the little Big Horn. However, the subject of the speech I reviewed does not deal with battling, but rather the unkept promises the American government made to the Sioux. Hearings were being conducted in Washington to hear the complaints of those who had lost land or other items of value during the war. So, the Chief had left with a delegation of his people and headed to Washington to see what was being done about the complaints the representatives from their tribe had lodged. Upon their arrival, he confronted Senator John Logan, a former civil war hero, because he had learned that the senator refused to acknowledge a single complaint made by the Sioux representative. In reaction to Logan’s arrogance, Sitting Bull became angered and accused Logan of â€Å"acting like a man drunk with whiskey.† Realizing that anger and finger pointing would get him nothing, Sitting Bull returned the next day in hopes of repairing the damage caused the previous day. Though first and foremost he was making an apology, he still wanted to express his resentment toward the United States government for the broken treaties and lies they had made with the S ioux tribe. His introduction was somewhat expected by those attending the hearings, so it did not make much of an impact but probably had the attention of all present because they wanted to see an â€Å"engine† apologize for his incivility. However if he had not apologized for his outburst the pr... Free Essays on Sitting Bull Free Essays on Sitting Bull Sitting Bull, said to be driven by the spirit, became chief of the Sioux tribe at an early age. His leadership included the time during in which America began its explorations of â€Å"The Great West†. In their expansion, they simply pushed the Native Americans back with promises of land and equal opportunities that were available to the whites. Throughout his reign, Chief Sitting Bull led his tribe through a number of confrontations with the American Army. The most famous of which being the Battle of the little Big Horn. However, the subject of the speech I reviewed does not deal with battling, but rather the unkept promises the American government made to the Sioux. Hearings were being conducted in Washington to hear the complaints of those who had lost land or other items of value during the war. So, the Chief had left with a delegation of his people and headed to Washington to see what was being done about the complaints the representatives from their tribe had lodged. Upon their arrival, he confronted Senator John Logan, a former civil war hero, because he had learned that the senator refused to acknowledge a single complaint made by the Sioux representative. In reaction to Logan’s arrogance, Sitting Bull became angered and accused Logan of â€Å"acting like a man drunk with whiskey.† Realizing that anger and finger pointing would get him nothing, Sitting Bull returned the next day in hopes of repairing the damage caused the previous day. Though first and foremost he was making an apology, he still wanted to express his resentment toward the United States government for the broken treaties and lies they had made with the S ioux tribe. His introduction was somewhat expected by those attending the hearings, so it did not make much of an impact but probably had the attention of all present because they wanted to see an â€Å"engine† apologize for his incivility. However if he had not apologized for his outburst the pr...

Samurai battle scenes (artwork) essays

Samurai battle scenes (artwork) essays The artwork,  ¡Ã‚ °Samurai battle scenes ¡ painted in the 19th century is a Japanese style artwork painted on a single four-fold screen in colour and gold leaf on paper. In the painting we get an overhead, almost a birds eye view of a samurai battle. Warriors are riding into battle on horseback, wearing armour and bearing weapons. The landscape is strewn with many bodies and horses and with the combination of diagonal parallel lines on the landscape creates the feeling of coordinated movement from the armies. Another factor of the painting, which catches the viewer ¡Ã‚ ¯s eye, are the clouds or fog overlaying the battle. The curves in the cloud also relay a feeling of smoothness and calm or even tranquillity, which is directly contrasted and even juxtaposed with the battle scene. This fog or cloud creates the simulation of a  ¡Ã‚ °birds eye ¡ view and another popular saying, the  ¡Ã‚ °fog of war. ¡ The cloud as previously mentioned contains a variety of possible different meanings. One such meaning suitable for the scene is the saying referred to as  ¡Ã‚ °the fog of war ¡. The painting conveys the much confusion in a battle with certain parts and sections of the painting covered by fog, and the interruption to tranquillity it can impose. The clouds in the painting are balanced and strewn apart so that the viewer has an even view of the battle. The horseman and warriors are also evenly scattered and balance the painting. It is hard to determine which facto dominates the painting, the calm tranquil clouds or the haphazard confused battle scene. Perhaps it is fair to say both dominate equally. It is also arguable that the battle scene is in dominance as battle and the way of the  ¡Ã‚ °samurai ¡ was a large concept in Japan those centuries ago. The aim of the painting seems to convey the concept of  ¡Ã‚ °heroes and victims ¡ in Japan ¡Ã‚ ¯s floating world. For centuries ma ...

Find two articles that are influential in the field of Organizational Essay

Find two articles that are influential in the field of Organizational Development - Essay Example In brief, organization development remains the dominant approach to organizational change. Organization development involves changing of the operations of the company to ensure suitability. The past, present and future trends indicate that organizational development still remains the key factor in the enactment of organizational change. Burnes and Cooke argue that the future of organization development is bright owing to the success witnessed in the process. The article is valuable in the evaluation of success and failures of organization development. Since its inception, organization development has been used to change operations within organizations with selected success being achieved. The article evaluates the past [present and future of organization development. Several issues are highlighted which are vital. Change is inevitable in any organization due to changes in the market economy and production. To understand the problem Burnes and Cooke addresses the past, present and future of organization development in the article thus developing a better understanding of organization development. According to Ron Cacioppe, organization development requires the support of the leadership structure to be successful. Organizational change is viewed by employees as a process of laying off workers leading to resistance when organization development is mentioned. The situation can be different if leadership and management encourage employees to participate in the change. The participation cannot be achieved without creativity and team building. Cacioppe addresses issues of leadership in organization development. Leadership development is vital during organizational restructuring. Modern management practices such as vision statement and balance score cards can be realigned to integrate the new operational models. The role of leadership is to develop a spirit at individual and team level to ensure